| ARTICLES |
|
| Year : 2005 | Volume
: 3
| Issue : 3 | Page : 192-202 |
|
|
Can There Be Healing Without Justice? Lessons from the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor
Dominique Le Touze1, Derrick Silove2, Anthony Zwi3
1 Professor Derrick Silove are from the Centre for Population Mental Health Research, Sydney South Western Area Health Service and the Psychiatry Research and Teaching Unit, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales
2 Psychiatry Research and Teaching Unit, Level 4, Health Services Building, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Sydney Australia
3 Head of the School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales
Correspondence Address:
Derrick Silove
Psychiatry Research and Teaching Unit, Level 4, Health Services Building, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Sydney Australia
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|
|
|
Truth and reconciliation processes initiated in post-conflict countries have several interrelated objectives with the two key aims being to confront past injustices and to heal the suffering caused by such abuses. Structural constraints, however, often limit the extent to which justice can be achieved for all victims and their families. The present report is based on a review of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation (known by its Portuguese acronym CAVR), a national initiative that was concluded in 2005. The review was based on interviews with key staff associated with the Commission. Although the key CAVR personnel and support agencies interviewed believed that the process was beneficial, they also noted that a minority of participants continued to suffer from a range of traumatic mental health problems that required special psychological attention. Pervasive anger was evident amongst survivors, particularly in response to the impunity enjoyed by the leading perpetrators of past atrocities, lost of whom had sought refuge in Indonesia. Lessons from East Timor and elsewhere suggest the importance of anticipating the inevitable feelings of anger and frustration arising from the limitations of TRC processes in achieving justice for all victims.
|
|
|
|
| [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
